•  

    Acontius James

    A contius James,  (Ital. Giacomo Aconzio,) was born at Trent, early in the sixteenth century. We learn from a letter, addressed by him to John Wolfius, of Zurich, that he was educated for the profession of the Law, and afterwards spent many years in a Court ; not, however, basking in its luxurious ease and blandishments, but engaged in the duties of a laborious department. In another letter, addressed to his friend, Francis Betti, he speaks of their being joint exiles from their native country, for the sake of the Gospel.

    Acontius left Italy in 1557, and settled in England, where he was employed by Queen Elizabeth in the capacity of a military engineer. He joined the Strangers' Church in Augustin Friars, London ; and incurred the censure of Grindal, on account of the freedom of his religious opinions. Little is known of his subsequent history ; but Cheynell informs us, that he was living as late as the year 1613. (The Divine Trinunity, p. 443.)

    Peltius, in the Dedication of his "Harmonia Remonstrantium et Socinianorum," calls him "clandestinus Socinianorum assecla;" and Pareus, in a letter written March 1st, 1613, and addressed to N. N., mentions him, in connexion with Bonfinius, as secretly favouring the Socinians. Voetius says, that the Arminians made great use of him ; and that he was but one remove from a Socinian, or was guilty at least of a Socinian syncretism, because he expressly condemns the heresy of the Sabellians, while he tacitly favours that of the Photinians. "This moderate man," says Cheynell, (p. 446,) "did never say, that it was necessary for our Salvation to know and beleeve that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are one and the same God, who is the only true God blessed for ever." Peter Ramus testifies his admiration of Acontius, as one who has long been favourably known to the world by the excellent monuments of his wisdom ; and Commenius makes honourable mention of him, in the Preface to his "Idea or Epitome of Natural Philosophy." Rivet speaks of him as the forerunner, or fellow-soldier of the Socinians ; and Arminius calls him "divinum prudentiae et moderationis lumen."

    He was the author of a Latin work in eight books, entitled "Satanae Stratagemata," which he dedicated to his patron, Queen Elizabeth. From this work it has been inferred, both by orthodox and heterodox readers, that he was an Antitrinitarian. "It is his maine business and designe in his third Book," says Cheynell, (p. 447,) " which is now in English, and in his seventh, which I hope will never be Englished, to shew, what are the only points necessary to be beleeved for the attainment of Salvation. But Acontius is not very modest when he comes to pass sentence upon the Ancients, who were rigidly Orthodoxe, and faithfully severe in requiring men to beleeve those grand Articles of Faith, which are necessary to Salvation. For when he discourses of the faith of the man sick of the Palsie, he saith, 'Credebat enim (ut par est,) hominem eum qui Jesus diceretur, &c.' ' For he believed (in all probability, saith the Translatour) that that same man whose name was Jesus came from God, and was in favour with God ; and therefore he hoped that by this means he might recover his health. But that he knew all those things which the Church hath for a long time accounted as Articles of Faith necessary to be beleeved to Salvation, how likely a matter it is, I leave it to every man to judge. There are likewise many other Texts to the very same purpose.' Concerning the faith of Abraham he speakes somewhat like an Arminian, and an Anabaptist, but concludes like a Socinian ; that Abraham did beleeve, 1. That he should be the Father of many Nations. 2. That the Nations should be happy by his seed. 3. Somewhat concerning the Land of Canaan. ' But,' saith he, ' of those points of Religion which it is judged every body is bound to know upon pain of damnation, we read not a word. Yea, and the mystery of Salvation itself by his seed is very closely and obscurely promised.' I know Acontius doth acknowledge Christ to be the Son of God, and to be God, and so do the Socinians in some sense, as we have shewn: But then Acontius qualifies all with a pretty diversion. 'Many things,' saith he, 'may be reckoned up, which that we might be saved, ought both to be, and to be performed : As that our sins were to be abolished, and that by a man void of all sin, and of infinite virtue and power, and he therefore to be the Son of God, yea, God, and the like.' And then he presently mixes some things of lesse consequence, and concludes thus. 'Doubtless that it may evidently appeare to us that these things are likewise necessary to be known, either we must have a plain Text of Scripture that shall pronounce, Whatsoever is necessary to be done, that also (to attain Salvation) must necessarily be beleeved.—But there is no Testimony of Scripture that I know which pronounces, That what ever ought to be done ought to be beleeved.' By this one taste you may plainly see, that though it should be granted necessary unto Salvation, that Christ should be God, abolish sin, &c, yet Acontius will not grant, that this is necessary to be beleeved for the attainment of Salvation ; and therefore he left it out of his Catholick Creed, and Syncretisme, and yet condemns the Sabellians, who did not deny the Godhead of Christ, but said that he was one God (and somewhat which they should not have said, or beleeved, that he was one Person) with God the Father. You may hereby understand the modesty of the man, and cry out as he did, 'En modestiam satis perfrictam, usque ad os impudentiae perfrictam.' But if his seventh Book (which the Translatour durst not adventure to English till he saw how this would take) had been translated, I need not have said any more for the discovery of this subtill Sir."

    The " Satanae Stratagemata" was first printed at Basle in 1565. A second edition of it appeared at the same place in 1610, to which was added a Letter by the author, "De Ratione edendorum Librorum." A third edition was printed at Oxford in 1631 ; and a fourth at Amsterdam in 1674.

    "It is impossible," says a writer in the "Monthly Repository," (Vol. XVI. pp. 456—458,) "to read the work of this great man, without being delighted with the amiable and enlightened spirit which breathes through every page. To our shame be it spoken, that, although from the circumstances under which it was written, it is peculiarly connected with England, it has never been translated (at least in a complete state) into our own language. But it had the misfortune of too far anticipating the progress of civilization. Had it been less excellent, it would have been more prized. The highest eulogium will be pronounced upon it, if I say that some of the finest passages of Milton's Areopagitica, may be traced to Acontius. It is melancholy, however, to see how popular prejudices affect the greatest works, even when the author has freed his own opinions from their thraldom."

    " Some said of him," writes the author of "Free Thoughts on Religion, the Church, and National Happiness," (pp. 223, 224,) "that he had a mind to reduce all sects into one, and inclose them in the same ark, as Noah did all sorts of animals in his, wherein they were preserv'd, tho' sustained by different food: others accuse him, that by reducing the points necessary to salvation to a small number, and requiring a toleration for the particular opinions, which were against the other articles, he open'd a wide door to all manner of heresies."

    The first four Books of "Satanae Stratagemata" were translated into English, and published by John Goodwin, in 1648, 4to., under the title of "Satan's Stratagems, or the Devil's Cabinet-Councel discovered." The translation was not a very happy one, and was far from doing justice to the powerful reasoning of Acontius. John Goodwin, however, was not unworthy of the cause ; for his Epistle to the Reader proves him to have been firmly attached to the great principles of religious liberty. The translation probably had a slow sale ; for in the year 1651, a part of the impression of 1648 was re-issued, with the following title. "Darkness Discovered, or the Devil's secret Stratagems laid open." Acontius's works were

    1. The Stratagems of Satan. Basle, 1565. 1610. 1631. 1674.

    2. On the Method of publishing Books. 1610.

    3. The right Method of investigating and transmitting Arts and Sciences. 1658.

    4. A Letter inserted in the Second Part of Thomas Crenius's Animadv. Philolog. et Historic. Cap. iv. § ix. To whom this Letter was addressed is unknown, as the manuscript from which it was printed was much soiled and worn, and the direction was lost.

    (Vidend. Zindsey's Hist. View of the State of the Unitarian Doctrine and Worship from the Reformation to our own Times. Lond. 1783, 8vo. Chap. ii. pp. 79—84. M. B. H. apud Mon. Rep. Vol. XVI. (1821) p. 456. CheyneWs Rise, Growth and Danger of Socinianisme. Lond. 1643, 4to. Chap. iv. pp. 36—39. CheyneWs Divine Trinunity. Lond. 1650, 8vo. pp. 441—459. Free Thoughts on Religion, the Church, and National Happiness: by B. M. 2nd Ed. Lond. 1729, 12mo. 1. c. Bayle, Diet. Hist, et Crit Art. Aconce. T. Crenii Anim. Philol. et Hist. P. ii. C. ii. § ii. pp. 30—33; C. iv. § ix. pp. 131 —138.) 


    didier Le Roux

    Retourpage d'accueil
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    Le Roux Didier- Unitariens - © Depuis 2006 – Tous droits réservés
    "Aucune reproduction, même partielle, autres que celles prévues à l'article L 122-5 du code de la propriété intellectuelle, ne peut être faite de ce site sans l'autorisation expresse de l'auteur ".


    votre commentaire


  • Abrahamz Galen

      

    Abrahamz Galen,  Van Haan, was a Doctor of Medicine, and founder of the sect of Galenists, which sprang up in Holland about the year 1664, and was a branch or offshoot of the Waterlandians, or more liberal portion of the Dutch Anabaptists. He was the Pastor of a Mennonite congregation at Amsterdam; and such was the reputation which he acquired, that even his enemies bore testimony to his uncommon penetration and eloquence. Like the Arminians, he considered the Christian religion as a system of practice rather than of faith; and contended, that every one was entitled to the privileges of Christian communion, who acknowledged the divine authority of the Old and New Testament, and led a holy and virtuous life. His sentiments concerning the person of Christ, and the nature of Christian Redemption, were similar to those of the Polish Unitarians.

    William Penn, the celebrated Quaker, gives the following account of a disputation, which he and several other Friends had with Galen Abrahamz and his followers. "1677, 8th Month, Amsterdam.—We had a meeting with Galen Abrahams, (the great father of the Socinian Mennists in these parts,) accompanied with several Preachers, and others of his congregation: divers of our friends were also present. It continued about five hours. He affirmed, in opposition to us, that 'there was no Christian Church, ministry, or commission apostolical, now in the world. But the Lord assisted us with his wisdom and strength to confound his attempts."

    As it will probably not be uninteresting to the reader of these volumes, to learn something more of this branch of the Mennonite Baptists, the following remarks, from the pen of the Rev. Fred. Adrian Vander Kemp, may not be deemed altogether out of place. They are extracted from the concluding part of a communication, made by that gentleman to the late Rev. Robert Aspland, and inserted in the Monthly Repository for the year 1817,—a periodical of which Mr. A. was for a long series of years the able and disinterested editor, and which was conscientiously devoted by him to the support of truth and liberty.

    "The two principal and most numerous divisions [of the Mennonite Baptists] are, 1. that, which I shall designate as rigid, calling themselves Mennonists. They have numerous congregations in the north part of Holland, Friesland, Groningen, and a Seminary of learning at Amsterdam, for the education of students for the ministry. Their first Professor was Jac. Rysdyck, his successor Petr. Schmid, as late as 1788. They are generally rigid Calvinists, and in harmony with the most zealous Orthodox in the Reformed Churches. The name of their principal meeting-house is designated by the name of the Sun, borrowed probably from a building in the vicinity. 2. The other section, which I shall call liberal, in opposition to them, are known generally as Baptists, approving the tenets defended generally by the congregations of De Toren, (turris,) an edifice in its neighbourhood, and het lam, (lamb,) a name of a brewery next to it. They have no creeds, no formularies whatever, and are numerous in the principal cities of SudHolland, Friesland, Utrecht. Their members are chiefly Unitarians, as well as their Ministers, though many have adopted the Arian hypothesis; many the system of Dr. S. Clarke; and often in the same congregations opposite tenets are defended, with a Christian spirit, without a shadow of rancour. Many eminently learned men have appeared among them: Jo. Hinstra, Allard Hulshoft, Nic. de Fries; and before them, Galenus Abrahams. Their Seminary at Amsterdam flourished under the care of Tjerk Nieuwenhuys, since 1735, Heere Oosterbaen and Hesselink, and was endowed with a splendid apparatus for Experimental Philosophy, in which their Professor every week gave lectures to his students, as well as in Theology, who, besides this, were benefited by the lectures of the Professors of the Athenaeum, and the Seminary of the Remonstrants. They had, in the latter part of the 18th century, five Ministers at Amsterdam, four at Haerlem, two at Leyden, three at Rotterdam, and one at Dordrecht."

     

    (Vidend. Moshemii Inst . H. E. Stec. xvii. Sect . ii. P. ii. C. v. § vii.

    p. 892. Bock, Hist. Ant. T. I. p. 137. William Penn's Travails, 12mo. 1694, p. 243. Mon. Rep. Vol. XU. pp. 449—454.)

     

     
     Didier Le Roux
     
    Retourpage d'accueil
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    Le Roux Didier- Unitariens - © Depuis 2006 - Tous droits réservés
    "Aucune reproduction, même partielle, autres que celles prévues à l'article L 122-5 du code de la propriété intellectuelle, ne peut être faite de ce site sans l'autorisation expresse de l'auteur ".

     


    votre commentaire


    Suivre le flux RSS des articles de cette rubrique
    Suivre le flux RSS des commentaires de cette rubrique